Investing

Corporate bonds and the pursuit of stability

  • 15.AUG.2016
  • Richard Murphy,  XTB

The great thing about fixed income investments is that they typically provide greater capital stability than equities, property or other growth investments.

But, just how secure and stable are we talking? In an environment of global uncertainty and volatility, it seems pertinent to ask.

Corporate bond stability

Not long ago we hosted a Bond Forum for advisers and the media in Sydney. Expert panellists joined us from BondAdviser, Challis Investment Partners, Morningstar and Ord Minnett. The Forum looked at the opportunities currently available in Australia’s fixed income markets.

One of the questions that came up was: how likely is a corporate bond issuer to default? In the challenging economic environment we currently live in, that’s a reasonable question. It’s not uncommon to see businesses struggle and even fail, so default risk is relevant.  Whether bonds are generally stable or not is a related but different question to whether the issuer could default.

Corporate bonds: Key features

Before I deal with stability and possible default, let’s recap some of the key features of senior corporate bonds from investment grade issuers. These factors determine their capital stability:

  • A corporate bond is a debt security – a loan to the company by you, the investor
  • When you loan someone money – you expect to be paid back along with interest. The company cannot change the interest amount (the bond’s coupon), or the payment dates
  • The face value of the bond will be repaid when it matures and the company can’t change the maturity date,
  • On the day you buy a fixed-rate corporate bond (or XTB over it on ASX), the return you will receive (yield to maturity) is 100% known to you. This is due to the fixed nature of the coupon & principal payments and dates
  • Only a default by the company can change this outcome (or if you sell prior to maturity)

Bonds are very different to equities

On the day I wrote this blog, Aurizon shares fell more than 7% on the back of sub-par financial results.  The bonds didn’t budge, in fact they increased in price slightly.  Nobody thought the poor financial results were anything to worry about in terms of Aurizon being able to pay its debts.  The seniority of the bonds and the fact the company has an obligation to pay its senior bondholders on time is at the heart of why bonds are stable.

It’s important to keep in mind that corporate bonds are very different to the shares issued by the same company. The board of the company has considerable latitude to vary dividends or, indeed, not pay them at all. Also shares are perpetual, so there is no ‘principal’ to be paid back. You own part of the company as a shareholder, so you enjoy (or suffer) the ups and downs that come with that.  A bondholder is owed money by the company – principal plus interest on hard fixed dates – period, or the company is in default.

Share price vs Bond price

The factors that determine the price of shares include everything that can possibly impact the value of the business. This depends on every investors’ perceptions or opinions on the business, and their view on the future stream of earnings.  Bonds prices represent the present day value of the coupons and principal. They take account of the risk the issuer will not meet these payment obligations (credit risk).

Recently we have seen a number of examples of the share price of a leading Australian company falling quite sharply, with little or no movement in their bond price.

These situations are essentially very simple to explain:

  • Equity investors have changed their view on the value of the business
  • Bond investors haven’t changed their view on the company’s ability to keep paying the interest and principal.

 

Relative total returns performance of Qantas shares vs the average of the 3 Qantas XTBs when the share price fell 11% in April 2016.

Qantas equities vs bond price movements
Source: Australian Corporate Bond Company and Bloomberg

Bonds are not all created equal

Of course, not all companies are equal when it comes to the ability to keep paying the interest and principal on their bonds. The credit ratings that are applied by major ratings agencies such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch give some indication of the credit risk of that issuer. Stronger credit ratings for banks and the largest ASX listed companies indicate they’re a safer bet. Lower ratings, but still investment grade (BBB- or above) indicate greater risk for which you’ll receive a greater return.

You can get a sense of this risk in the yield-to-maturity of same tenor (time to maturity) corporate bonds from one company versus another. In general, the company with the higher credit risk will trade at a higher yield-to-maturity (lower price).

Also not all securities that are issued by a company are equal when it comes to credit risk. We’ve seen the ‘chalk and cheese’ differences between equity and debt, but many companies, banks in particular have other securities that sit between senior debt and shares.  In the event a company gets into financial trouble, holders of the senior bonds will be paid out first. This occurs before holders of subordinated debt and is followed by the various forms of hybrids and preference shares with Shareholders paid last.  There may be nothing left after the senior bondholders get paid.

What is the likelihood of a corporate bond credit event?

Yes bonds are generally stable but what about that question of default that came up at the bond forum?  How likely is it?   Capital stability won’t mean much if a company suddenly had some major calamity and gets into very significant trouble.  This is where the bond issuer defaulting becomes a very real possibility.  While it’s not at all common for ASX 50 to 100 companies, it does happen and it can’t be ignored as a risk.

S&P publishes default probability stats on a regular basis. They are based on actual defaults globally of both investment grade and non-investment grade issuers.  For example, the default probability they published for 3 year investment grade bonds was less than 0.3%.  Longer dated bonds have a higher probability because the risk any company could collapse increases as you move further into the future.

In Australia, the corporate bond market is still relatively under-developed compared with the US and over-concentrated in very high-quality names. Defaults by investment grade issuers have been rare in Australia and we don’t have the same well-developed sub-investment grade, or high-yield bond market as the US.

Over the last 30 years, Babcock & Brown and Pasminco are the only 2 companies that defaulted and whose corporate bonds started life as investment grade (i.e. with a credit rating of BBB- or better).

The high profile defaults of businesses that took place in the wake of the GFC such as Storm, Gunns, Timbercorp did not have a credit ratings or involve bond holders.

What about hybrids?

Thanks in part to the performance of some hybrids during the GFC, there is increasing evidence that investors and advisers now understand that hybrids can behave like equities at the time that you least want them to.

Specifically, if the issuing company gets into trouble, hybrids can convert into equities or have their call dates deferred – or both. Also the income from a hybrid can be deferred by the issuer, or not paid at all. While you are compensated for these risks with a higher coupon rate, their price volatility means you have to monitor the capital price of the hybrid as well as the income.

Comparing risks and volatility of different asset classes

High quality fixed income now easily accessible

Recent innovations, such as the introduction of XTBs, mean that high quality fixed income securities are readily accessible by investors on ASX.

XTBs provide access to 39 individual senior bonds of high quality names from among the top 100 ASX listed companies. This makes them a capital stable alternative to cash and TDs without the capital volatility of hybrids and equities. That number will grow to 50 and beyond and Starter Packs will be available shortly to make choosing easier.

In a world where volatility and uncertainty have become the new norm, capital stability and safety are undeniably more precious than ever. Yes, a corporate bond issuer can default, but no, the likelihood is not high, particularly among the investment grade issuers in the top 100 ASX companies. Will XTBs meet your pursuit of stability? I’d say yes.

Useful links:

Previous blogs:

Events

  • 28Jul 2017

    YTMF11: WESTPAC BBSW+0.90% 28 JUL 2020

    This is the coupon date

  • 28Jul 2017

    YTMWB1: WESTPAC 3.50% 28 JUL 2020

    This is the coupon date

View Calendar
View Insights

Top insights stories

Corporate bonds and the pursuit

Read Article
Insights

Your Money Your Call: Bonds.

Watch now
Insights

Where to for investors in

Read Article
Insights

CommSec Executive Series Interview

Watch now
Insights